Carregant...
Carregant...

Vés al contingut (premeu Retorn)

Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions

Autor
Tolchinsky, F.; Modgil, S.; Atkinson, K.; McBurney, P.; Cortes, U.
Tipus d'activitat
Article en revista
Revista
Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
Data de publicació
2012-09
Volum
25
Número
2
Pàgina inicial
209
Pàgina final
259
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-011-9174-5 Obrir en finestra nova
Repositori
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/16387 Obrir en finestra nova
Resum
In this paper we present the argument-based model ProCLAIM, intended to provide a setting for heterogeneous agents to deliberate over safety critical actions. To achieve this purpose ProCLAIM features a Mediator Agent with three main tasks: 1) guiding the participating agents in what their valid dialectical moves are at each stage of the dialogue; 2)deciding whether submitted arguments should be accepted on the basis of their relevance; and finally, 3) evaluating the accepted arguments in order ...
Citació
Tolchinsky, F. [et al.]. Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions. "Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems", Setembre 2012, vol. 25, núm. 2, p. 209-259.
Paraules clau
Argument Schemes, Argumentation, Deliberation, Multi-agent Systems
Grup de recerca
IDEAI-UPC Intelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence
KEMLG - Grup d´Enginyeria del Coneixement i Aprenentatge Automàtic

Participants

  • Tolchinsky Landsmann, Francisco  (autor)
  • Modgil, Sanjay  (autor)
  • Atkinson, Katie  (autor)
  • McBurney, Peter  (autor)
  • Cortes Garcia, Claudio Ulises  (autor)

Arxius