Carregant...
Carregant...

Vés al contingut (premeu Retorn)

Principal component analysis vs. independent component analysis for damage detection

Autor
Mujica, L.E.; Tibaduiza, D.A.; Anaya, M.; Rodellar, J.; Güemes Gordo, Jesús Alfredo
Tipus d'activitat
Presentació treball a congrés
Nom de l'edició
6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring
Any de l'edició
2012
Data de presentació
2012-07
Llibre d'actes
Proceedings 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring & 1st European Conference On Prognostics and Health Management, July 3-6, 2012, Dresden, Germany
Projecte finançador
Estructuras inteligentes: sistemas de monitorización e identificación de daños con aplicación en aeronáutica y en plantas eólicas
Repositori
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/18539 Obrir en finestra nova
Resum
In previous works, the authors showed advantages and drawbacks of the use of PCA and ICA by separately. In this paper, a comparison of results in the application of these methodologies is presented. Both of them exploit the advantage of using a piezoelectric active system in different phases. An initial baseline model for the undamaged structure is built applying each technique to the data collected by several experiments. The current structure (damaged or not) is subjected to the same experimen...
Citació
Tibaduiza, D.A. [et al.]. Principal component analysis vs. independent component analysis for damage detection. A: European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. "Proceedings 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring & 1st European Conference On Prognostics and Health Management, July 3-6, 2012, Dresden, Germany". Dresden: 2013.
Grup de recerca
CoDAlab - Control, Modelització, Identificació i Aplicacions

Participants

Arxius