Loading...
Loading...

Go to the content (press return)

Principal component analysis vs. independent component analysis for damage detection

Author
Mujica, L.E.; Tibaduiza, D.A.; Anaya, M.; Rodellar, J.; Güemes Gordo, Jesús Alfredo
Type of activity
Presentation of work at congresses
Name of edition
6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring
Date of publication
2012
Presentation's date
2012-07
Book of congress proceedings
Proceedings 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring & 1st European Conference On Prognostics and Health Management, July 3-6, 2012, Dresden, Germany
Project funding
Estructuras inteligentes: sistemas de monitorización e identificación de daños con aplicación en aeronáutica y en plantas eólicas
Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/18539 Open in new window
Abstract
In previous works, the authors showed advantages and drawbacks of the use of PCA and ICA by separately. In this paper, a comparison of results in the application of these methodologies is presented. Both of them exploit the advantage of using a piezoelectric active system in different phases. An initial baseline model for the undamaged structure is built applying each technique to the data collected by several experiments. The current structure (damaged or not) is subjected to the same experimen...
Citation
Tibaduiza, D.A. [et al.]. Principal component analysis vs. independent component analysis for damage detection. A: European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. "Proceedings 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring & 1st European Conference On Prognostics and Health Management, July 3-6, 2012, Dresden, Germany". Dresden: 2013.
Group of research
CoDAlab - Control, Dynamics and Applications

Participants

Attachments