Loading...
Loading...

Go to the content (press return)

Better feedback for educational online judges

Author
Mani, A.; Venkataramani, D.; Petit, J.; Roura, S.
Type of activity
Presentation of work at congresses
Name of edition
6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
Date of publication
2014
Book of congress proceedings
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Volume 2: Barcelona, Spain, 1-3 April, 2014
First page
176
Last page
183
Publisher
SciTePress
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5220/0004842801760183 Open in new window
Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/28174 Open in new window
Abstract
The verdicts of most online programming judges are, essentially, binary: the submitted codes are either “good enough” or not. Whilst this policy is appropriate for competitive or recruitment platforms, it can hinder the adoption of online judges on educative settings, where it could be adequate to provide better feedback to a student (or instructor) that has submitted a wrong code. An obvious option would be to just show him or her an instance where the code fails. However, that particular...
Citation
Mani, A. [et al.]. Better feedback for educational online judges. A: International Conference on Computer Supported Education. "Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Volume 2: Barcelona, Spain, 1-3 April, 2014". Barcelona: SciTePress, 2014, p. 176-183.
Keywords
Automatic assessment, Data mining, Online programming judges
Group of research
ALBCOM - Algorithms, Computational Biology, Complexity and Formal Methods

Participants

Attachments