Loading...
Loading...

Go to the content (press return)

Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: why stochastic modeling has not yet permeated into practitioners?

Author
Sanchez-Vila, X.; Fernandez, D.
Type of activity
Journal article
Journal
Water resources research
Date of publication
2016-12
Volume
52
Number
12
First page
9246
Last page
9258
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019302 Open in new window
Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/101990 Open in new window
URL
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016WR019302/abstract Open in new window
Abstract
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Sanchez-Vila, X., and D. Fernàndez-Garcia (2016), Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: Why stochastic modeling has not yet permeated into practitioners?, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9246–9258, doi:10.1002/2016WR019302], which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016WR019302/abstract. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Term...
Citation
Sanchez-Vila, X., Fernandez, D. Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: why stochastic modeling has not yet permeated into practitioners?. "Water resources research", Desembre 2016, vol. 52, núm. 12, p. 9246-9258.
Keywords
Stochastic modeling, field applications, non-Fickian transport, reactive transport, upscaling
Group of research
GHS - Hydrogeology Group

Participants

Attachments