Loading...
Loading...

Go to the content (press return)

Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?

Author
Blanco, D.; Biganne, A.; Cobo, E.
Type of activity
Journal article
Journal
Trials
Date of publication
2018-01-29
Volume
19
Number
80
First page
1
Last page
4
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2475-0 Open in new window
Project funding
Methods in research on research
Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/113406 Open in new window
URL
https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2475-0 Open in new window
Abstract
Background: Compulsory submission of a checklist from the relevant reporting guideline is one of the most widespread journal requirements aiming to improve completeness of reporting. However, the current suboptimal levels of adherence to reporting guidelines observed in the literature may indicate that this journal policy is not having a significant effect. Findings: We explored whether authors provided the appropriate CONSORT checklist extension for their study and whether there were inconsiste...
Citation
Blanco, D., Biganne, A., Cobo, E. Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?. "Trials", 29 Gener 2018, vol. 19, núm. 80, p. 1-4.
Keywords
Reporting guidelines - Completeness of reporting - Reporting inconsistencies- CONSORTEndorsement
Group of research
GRBIO - Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Group

Participants

Attachments