Loading...
Loading...

Go to the content (press return)

Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review

Author
Superchi, C.; Gonzalez, J.; Solà, I.; Cobo, E.; Hren, D.; Boutron, I.
Type of activity
Journal article
Journal
BMC medical research methodology
Date of publication
2019-03-06
Volume
19
Number
48
First page
1
Last page
14
DOI
10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x
Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/130297 Open in new window
URL
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x Open in new window
Abstract
Background A strong need exists for a validated tool that clearly defines peer review report quality in biomedical research, as it will allow evaluating interventions aimed at improving the peer review process in well-performed trials. We aim to identify and describe existing tools for assessing the quality of peer review reports in biomedical research. Methods We conducted a methodological systematic review by searching PubMed, EMBASE (via Ovid) and The Cochrane Methodology Register (via The C...
Citation
Superchi, C. [et al.]. Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review. "BMC medical research methodology", 6 Març 2019, vol. 19, núm. 48, p. 1-14.
Keywords
Quality control, methods, report, systematic review
Group of research
GNOM - Mathematical Optimization Group
GRBIO - Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Group

Participants

Attachments