Loading...
Loading...

Go to the content (press return)

A survey exploring biomedical editors’ perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines

Author
Blanco, D.; Hren , D.; Kirkham, J.; Cobo, E.; Schroter, S.
Type of activity
Journal article
Journal
F1000 Research Ltd
Date of publication
2019-09-24
Volume
8
First page
1682:1
Last page
1682: 21
DOI
10.12688/f1000research.20556.1
Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/174090 Open in new window
URL
https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1682/v1 Open in new window
Abstract
Background: Improving the completeness of reporting of biomedical research is essential for improving its usability. For this reason, hundreds of reporting guidelines have been created in the last few decades but adherence to these remains suboptimal. This survey aims to inform future evaluations of interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines. In particular, it gathers editors’ perceptions of a range of interventions at various stages in the editorial process. Methods: We survey...
Citation
Blanco, D. [et al.]. A survey exploring biomedical editors’ perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines. "F1000 Research Ltd", 24 Setembre 2019, vol. 8, p. 1682:1-1682: 21.
Keywords
Barriers, Completeness of reporting, Facilitators, Journal policies, Quality of reporting, Reporting guidelines, Survey
Group of research
GRBIO - Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Group

Participants

Attachments